Google      
  WWW DocMirror.net

[ RFC3255 | RFC Index | Protocol Standards | Linux Docs | FreeBSD Docs | RFC3257 ]

RFC 3256








Network Working Group                                           D. Jones
Request for Comments: 3256                               YAS Corporation
Category: Standards Track                                      R. Woundy
                                                          AT&T Broadband
                                                              April 2002


  The DOCSIS (Data-Over-Cable Service Interface Specifications) Device
      Class DHCP (Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol) Relay Agent
                         Information Sub-option

Status of this Memo

   This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
   Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
   improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
   Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
   and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Abstract

   This document proposes a new sub-option to the DHCP (Dynamic Host
   Configuration Protocol) Relay Agent Information Option.  This new
   sub-option is for use with DOCSIS (Data-Over-Cable Service Interface
   Specifications) cable modems and describes a "device class" to which
   the cable modem belongs.  The cable modem signals its device class
   information to the Relay Agent using DOCSIS signaling, and the Relay
   Agent forwards the device class information to the DHCP Server which
   can then make a policy decision based on it.

1.  Introduction

   The "Relay Agent Information" Option is described in [1] and includes
   several Relay Agent Information sub-options.  This RFC proposes an
   additional sub-option for use with DOCSIS cable modems.  This sub-
   option is added by DHCP relay agents which terminate cable modems.
   The sub-option encodes an identifier of the device class to which the
   cable modem belongs.  It is intended for use by DHCP servers to make
   policy decisions based on the device class of the host.

   The motivation for using a Relay Agent Information sub-option, rather
   than a new or existing DHCP option, is the introduction of CPE
   Controlled Cable Modems (CCCMs) [2].  In an implementation of a CCCM,
   the modem firmware controls DOCSIS signaling, but the attached
   computer (CPE) manages other protocol activities -- particularly DHCP
   client message handling.  The assumption of this document is that it





Jones & Woundy              Standards Track                     [Page 1]


RFC 3256              The DOCSIS Device Class DHCP            April 2002


   is better to trust the operation of the CCCM firmware, than to trust
   the operation of CCCM software running on the attached computer
   (e.g., a standard PC).

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", and "MAY"
   in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [4].

2.  DOCSIS Device Class Sub-option

   The DOCSIS RFI specification [3] specifies the Device Class encoding
   within the payload of the Device Class Identification Request (DCI-
   REQ) message.  The relay agent MUST pass the Device Class value
   unchanged to the DHCP server.  Possible uses of this field include:

      o  host endpoint information

      o  host hardware capabilities

      o  host software capabilities

      o  host options information

   DOCSIS defines the Device Class to be a 32-bit field where individual
   bits represent individual attributes of the CM.  Bit #0 is the least
   significant bit of the field.  Bits are set to 1 to select the
   attributes defined below.

      bit #0 - CPE Controlled Cable Modem (CCCM)

      bits #1-31 - Reserved and set to zero

   The DOCSIS Device Class sub-option is coded as follows:

       SubOpt   Len     Device Class
      +------+------+------+------+------+------+
      |  4   |   4  |  d1  |  d2  |  d3  |  d4  |
      +------+------+------+------+------+------+

   The DHCP server needs to understand the meaning of this sub-option in
   order to offer different policy options in its reply to the host.
   DHCP servers MAY use the device class for IP and other parameter
   assignment policies for cable modems.









Jones & Woundy              Standards Track                     [Page 2]


RFC 3256              The DOCSIS Device Class DHCP            April 2002


3.  Security Considerations

   Operation of the DHCP Relay Agent Information Option relies on an
   implied trusted relationship between the DHCP relay agent and the
   DHCP server.  The discussion of security considerations for the DHCP
   relay agent information option [1] apply to this sub-option as well.

   Operation of the DOCSIS Device Class sub-option relies on an implied
   trusted relationship between the DHCP client (i.e., the cable modem)
   and the DHCP relay agent, through DOCSIS signaling.  According to
   DOCSIS specifications [2], the cable modem firmware always controls
   DOCSIS signaling, but cannot control DHCP client message handling
   (e.g., CCCMs).  This document assumes that the cable modem firmware
   is trustworthy for DOCSIS signaling information.

   This document introduces a new identifier, the DOCSIS Device Class
   sub-option, that is provided by the relay agent device and is assumed
   to be trusted.  Cryptographic or other techniques to authenticate the
   device class are beyond the scope of this document.

4.  IANA Considerations

   IANA has assigned a value of 4 from the DHCP Relay Agent Sub-options
   space [RFC 3046] for the DOCSIS Device Class sub-option defined in
   section 2.

5.  References

   [1]   Patrick, M., "DHCP Relay Agent Information Option", RFC 3046,
         January 2001.

   [2]  "Data-Over-Cable Service Interface Specifications: Cable Modem
         to Customer Premise Equipment Interface Specification SP-CMCI-
         I07-020301", DOCSIS, March 2002, http://www.cablemodem.com.

   [3]  "Data-Over-Cable Service Interface Specifications: Cable Modem
         Radio Frequency Interface Specification SP-RFIv1.1-I08-020301",
         DOCSIS, March 2002, http://www.cablemodem.com.

   [4]   Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
         Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.










Jones & Woundy              Standards Track                     [Page 3]


RFC 3256              The DOCSIS Device Class DHCP            April 2002


6.  Authors' Addresses

   Doug Jones
   YAS Corporation
   300 Brickstone Square
   Andover, MA 01810

   Phone: (303) 661-3823
   EMail: doug@yas.com


   Rich Woundy
   AT&T Broadband
   27 Industrial Avenue
   Chelmsford, MA 01824

   Phone: (978) 244-4010
   EMail: rwoundy@broadband.att.com

































Jones & Woundy              Standards Track                     [Page 4]


RFC 3256              The DOCSIS Device Class DHCP            April 2002


7.  Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002).  All Rights Reserved.

   This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
   others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
   or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
   and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
   kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
   included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this
   document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
   the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
   Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
   developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
   copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
   followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
   English.

   The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
   revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.

   This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
   TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
   BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
   HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
   MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Acknowledgement

   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
   Internet Society.



















Jones & Woundy              Standards Track                     [Page 5]


Hosting by: Hurra Communications Ltd.
Generated: 2007-01-26 17:59:33