|
A: Miguel de Icaza < miguel@luthien.nuclecu.unam.mx> writes:I changed the ext2fs code to be aware of multiple-devices instead of the regular one device per file system assumption.So, when you want to extend a file system, you run a utility program that makes the appropriate changes on the new device (your extra partition) and then you just tell the system to extend the fs using the specified device.
You can extend a file system with new devices at system operation time, no need to bring the system down (and whenever I get some extra time, you will be able to remove devices from the ext2 volume set, again without even having to go to single-user mode or any hack like that).
You can get the patch for 2.1.x kernel from my web page:
http://www.nuclecu.unam.mx/~miguel/ext2-volume
A: Currently, (September 1997) no, not without erasing all data. A conversion utility to allow this does not yet exist. The problem is that the actual structure and layout of a RAID-5 array depends on the number of disks in the array. Of course, one can add drives by backing up the array to tape, deleting all data, creating a new array, and restoring from tape.
/dev/hdb
to /dev/hdc
?
Because of cabling/case size/stupidity issues, I had to
make my RAID sets on the same IDE controller (/dev/hda
and /dev/hdb
). Now that I've fixed some stuff, I want
to move /dev/hdb
to /dev/hdc
.
What would happen if I just change the /etc/mdtab
and
/etc/raid1.conf
files to reflect the new location?
A: For RAID-0/linear, one must be careful to specify the drives in exactly the same order. Thus, in the above example, if the original config isThen the new config *must* be
mdadd /dev/md0 /dev/hda /dev/hdbFor RAID-1/4/5, the drive's ''RAID number'' is stored in its RAID superblock, and therefore the order in which the disks are specified is not important. RAID-0/linear does not have a superblock due to it's older design, and the desire to maintain backwards compatibility with this older design.
mdadd /dev/md0 /dev/hda /dev/hdc
A: Yes. Michael at BizSystems has come up with a clever, sneaky way of doing this. However, like virtually all manipulations of RAID arrays once they have data on them, it is dangerous and prone to human error. Make a backup before you start.I will make the following assumptions: --------------------------------------------- disks original: hda - hdc raid1 partitions hda3 - hdc3 array name /dev/md0 new hda - hdc - hdd raid5 partitions hda3 - hdc3 - hdd3 array name: /dev/md1 You must substitute the appropriate disk and partition numbers for you system configuration. This will hold true for all config file examples. -------------------------------------------- DO A BACKUP BEFORE YOU DO ANYTHING 1) recompile kernel to include both raid1 and raid5 2) install new kernel and verify that raid personalities are present 3) disable the redundant partition on the raid 1 array. If this is a root mounted partition (mine was) you must be more careful. Reboot the kernel without starting raid devices or boot from rescue system ( raid tools must be available ) start non-redundant raid1 mdadd -r -p1 /dev/md0 /dev/hda3 4) configure raid5 but with 'funny' config file, note that there is no hda3 entry and hdc3 is repeated. This is needed since the raid tools don't want you to do this. ------------------------------- # raid-5 configuration raiddev /dev/md1 raid-level 5 nr-raid-disks 3 chunk-size 32 # Parity placement algorithm parity-algorithm left-symmetric # Spare disks for hot reconstruction nr-spare-disks 0 device /dev/hdc3 raid-disk 0 device /dev/hdc3 raid-disk 1 device /dev/hdd3 raid-disk 2 --------------------------------------- mkraid /etc/raid5.conf 5) activate the raid5 array in non-redundant mode mdadd -r -p5 -c32k /dev/md1 /dev/hdc3 /dev/hdd3 6) make a file system on the array mke2fs -b {blocksize} /dev/md1 recommended blocksize by some is 4096 rather than the default 1024. this improves the memory utilization for the kernel raid routines and matches the blocksize to the page size. I compromised and used 2048 since I have a relatively high number of small files on my system. 7) mount the two raid devices somewhere mount -t ext2 /dev/md0 mnt0 mount -t ext2 /dev/md1 mnt1 8) move the data cp -a mnt0 mnt1 9) verify that the data sets are identical 10) stop both arrays 11) correct the information for the raid5.conf file change /dev/md1 to /dev/md0 change the first disk to read /dev/hda3 12) upgrade the new array to full redundant status (THIS DESTROYS REMAINING raid1 INFORMATION) ckraid --fix /etc/raid5.conf
Hosting by: Hurra Communications Ltd.
Generated: 2007-01-26 17:58:05